Why personalization is a balancing act

ShoppingRecently, I posted a picture of my bare feet on Instagram #withoutshoes for a great cause – a campaign by Toms to give away a million pairs of shoes to children in need. And I wasn’t alone. My Twitter and Facebook feeds filled up with pictures of feet, as well as related articles and products. Clearly, the campaign was a success.

But it got me thinking about the feeds themselves, and how social networks and other sites filter and personalize data to present us with content that they think we want. Sometimes they’re eerily prescient, and other times they’re simply unwanted. While I might have been interested in related wearables when I bought my Fitbit on Amazon, it doesn’t mean I want them dominating my searches long after my purchase.

IBM - Jon Simon/Feature Photo Service
IBM – Jon Simon/Feature Photo Service

Another downside of personalization is that consumers are frequently left in the dark about unseen options or information. For example, Google’s sophisticated matching algorithms return customized and personalized results for the same term to different users. Sometimes we don’t even know what we’re not seeing. And the more targeted that websites try to become, the greater the risk that they’ll miss their mark. Anyone who’s watched a trending music video on YouTube has experienced the odd result of being presented with unfathomably related music for weeks afterward.

But personalization is something most retailers now prioritize – to offer useful information, products and deals based on real-time data analysis of customer behavior and preferences. The recent IBM and Facebook partnership is further evidence that engaging customers with individualized content and offers is a major goal for retailers.

And consumers generally favor personalization. A recent Econsultancy and IBM study “The Consumer Conversation” found that only one in three consumers believe that their favorite companies understand them. Only 35 percent of consumers think that brand communications to them are relevant. And this sentiment is not limited to retail; it’s prevalent across all consumer-facing channels that have the potential to target and personalize.

social_business_supercharges_insightsWhile some organizations are working to understand and engage customers, most aren’t yet using that data to influence key engagement decisions, according to an IBM Center for Applied Insights study “Charting the Social Universe.” While increasing customer loyalty and advocacy was a top goal for pioneers, 70 percent of those surveyed who have deployed social analytics aren’t using them yet to influence decision making. This is an ambition with untapped potential.

Over time, the data itself may help us determine how much is too much. For now, the challenge of delivering in-context, personalized content and communications is a fine balance between paying attention to customers’ behavior and still giving them the freedom to explore new things without constraining their frame of reference.

5 responses to Why personalization is a balancing act

  1. CD Park says:

    It’s hard to imagine how personalization is going to change in five or ten years. It’s not going away — either it’ll be really scary or companies will figure out the right balance.


    • Cynthya says:

      Thanks for the comment. It’ll be interesting to see if there’s a shift soon in how consumers prioritize personalization versus anonymity.


  2. Good topic cause digital experience is getting more personal. Retailers do want to give shoppers what they want and definitely helps to narrow options down, less decision indecision. Amazon is leading & practicing personalization and sees 18% conversion (I ‘ve heard) which is pretty high

    The reverse is the recommendation engine to suggest non obvious products whether it be next movie I’d like. Technically, Google is in a better position to consolidate info across all its platforms – eg., apply your YouTube persona to your search results with Google play.

    Social – I suppose there is a data there but does it truly reflect is? Definitely only one side of us – eg., cause I share cute cat videos doesn’t make me a cat person.

    Is social truly a representative data source?


    • Cynthya says:

      Thanks for the comment. I agree that we aren’t always what we share, but social data can help indicate trends and preferences, and certainly to help validate it. It’s an interesting time and an interesting space to watch!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Pingbacks & Trackbacks

  1. […] Regarding the use of analytics as a source, Andy Crestodina demonstrated exactly how much detailed information you can pull on your audience in terms of who they are, where they came from, and what they are doing on your site, such as what device or browser they are using, how engaged they are, how many are international or millennial, what social networks they are coming from, etc. This is an important competitive advantage for businesses today as recent research by the IBM Center for Applied Insights has shown that analytics is changing the nature of how businesses operate and make decisions – in fact, seven in ten of the leading businesses say data-driven insights are integral to their decision making. However, there’s still a significant untapped opportunity in terms of how businesses can act on deeper audience insights to deliver more relevant content as another recent study shows – while increasing customer loyalty and advocacy was a top goal for social pioneers, 70 percent of those surveyed who have deployed social analytics aren’t using those insights ye…. […]